i like 'stored program analyzer' a-la akos varga's hungarian vax clones 
:) 

happy hacking
isildur

On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, David Woyciesjes wrote:

> 	But we should be careful anyway, though. If they see this, and think
> it could generate enough cash for them, they just might whack us. But I
> think we would be safe if we call it an emulator, because it won't be a Vax,
> per se, as they were originally built, right?
> 
> ---   David A Woyciesjes
> ---   C & IS Support Specialist
> ---   Yale University Press
> ---   mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
> ---   (203) 432-0953
> ---   ICQ # - 905818
> 
> 
> ! -----Original Message-----
> ! From: Lord Isildur [mailto:mrfusion@umbar.vaxpower.org]
> ! Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 4:58 PM
> ! To: Matt London
> ! Cc: Chuck McManis; port-vax@netbsd.org
> ! Subject: Re: NuVAX revisited
> ! 
> ! 
> ! If we do our own implementation, i dont think anybody could 
> ! complain- the
> ! architecture was published in the VARM, and we are merely making a
> ! compatible implementation. We could always call them Stored Program 
> ! Analyzers if somebody objects to calling them a vax... *grin*
> ! doing it from the prints would not be so clean legally.. but then, 
> ! were not selling them. would the Q care?
> ! i doubt it. they already have shown how much they care about the VAX .
> ! 
> ! On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Matt London wrote:
> ! > Sounds a lot like a plan to me (and hard work - but that's 
> ! no stranger)
> ! > 
> ! > Even if we never got it into hardware, to get that far 
> ! would be quite an
> ! > achievment :&)
> ! > 
> ! > Where do we stand regarding copyright and the like?
> ! 
>