Subject: Re: NetBSD/vax 2.0 on simh
To: Brian Hechinger <wonko@4amlunch.net>
From: Patrick Finnegan <vax@purdue.edu>
List: port-vax
Date: 12/09/2004 10:22:29
On Thursday 09 December 2004 09:47, Brian Hechinger wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 04:36:43PM +0100, Felix Deichmann wrote:
> > Dhrystone is THE CPU benchmark for a VAX :-)
> > 1 VUP = 1657 Dhrystones
> > And then compare to 3.8 VUPs for the KA655 (higher is better).
>
> ok, host machine:
>
> PowerMac 8600, 400Mhz G3, 512K L2, 416M RAM
> NetBSD 2.0
> simh 3.3
>
> VAX MIPS rating = 1.412
>
> well, that's not great. let's see how the E3500 does. ;)
Probably not a whole lot better... simh is single-threaded, so it'll
only really use one CPU, and there's probably not much speed difference
to SimH between the same MHz PPC G3 and UltraSparcII. Almost
definately no more than 50% better, and the UltraSparc might actually
be worse (for CPU intensive tasks). Sun Ultrasparc machines -
especially the Exy00 enterprise machines - are built for I/O
performance, not CPU horsepower.
Pat
--
Purdue University Research Computing -- http://www.itap.purdue.edu/rcac