Subject: Re: current port-vax status
To: Johnny Billquist <bqt@update.uu.se>
From: Gregg Levine <gregg.drwho8@gmail.com>
List: port-vax
Date: 03/07/2006 23:28:12
Hello from Gregg C Levine
Um not really. The XKernel concept was exactly as Dave describes. It
had the user set things up so that a Sun3 or Sun4 would work as an X
terminal for a box running Linux.
Now such an idea has become something of an extinct animal. I'm not
even sure its possible to build the binaries for XKernel. But finding
the hardware, a Sun3 or Sun4 should be relatively simple. Of course
I'd like to get the VAX Station I've got here working, but that's a
story for a new thread.
Oh and does anyone want a GMail address? Free invites to the first one
hundred requesting individuals.
--
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8@gmail.com
"This signature was once found posting rude
messages in English in the Moscow subway."
On 3/7/06, Johnny Billquist <bqt@update.uu.se> wrote:
> Aren't we just talking about an X-terminal here? DEC made those almost
> 20 years ago. Everything in firmware even.
> That's how you play X against a big VAX. :-)
>
> Johnny
>
> Dave McGuire wrote:
> > On Mar 7, 2006, at 4:45 PM, Rhialto wrote:
> >
> >> Stuff can be made fairly minimal - I have a stripped down NetBSD/sun3 =
to
> >> run as an X server and nothing else (netbooting). There is not even an
> >> init binary: it has been replaced by a shell script.
> >
> >
> > Mmm, sounds like Xkernel. :-) I ran an office full of those years
> > ago. Very cool indeed.
> >
> > -Dave
> >
> > --
> > Dave McGuire
> > Cape Coral, FL
> >
>
> --
> Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
> || on a psychedelic trip
> email: bqt@update.uu.se || Reading murder books
> pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
>