On 2012-05-27 14:54, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 05/27/2012 05:08 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
OK. Crashing on what instruction? There is no polyd/polyf in libm
anymore.
Hm. Would it make sense to re-code that to use poly[df] instructions
on machines that have them? Would the run-time check be more trouble
(or cycles) than it's worth?
I think the sane way is to actually just use poly[fd] all the time,
and let the emulation handle it if the machine don't actually
implement it in hardware.
No need for explicit checks, it's done automatically by the hardware.
Johnny