Port-vax archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Stupid VA layout question



On Mon, 2013-09-16 18:17:19 +0000, Christos Zoulas 
<christos%astron.com@localhost> wrote:
> In article <20130915115532.GC27782%mail.duskware.de@localhost>,
> Martin Husemann  <martin%duskware.de@localhost> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 03:34:25AM -0700, Matt Thomas wrote:
> > > > I have a binary I can't exec due to that limit (and am looking for the 
> > > > easiest
> > > > workaround).
> > > 
> > > How big?  What is it?  increase to 32MB?
> >
> >   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
> > 12754401         161352  167864 13083617         c7a3e1 build/gcc/cc1
> >
> >
> > I'll try with 32 MB (my physical vax has 128 MB RAM).
> 
> Tell me it is not gcc :-)

It is!

...and I'm really happy to see Martin working on getting the binary
running. Once it works again, at least somewhat, it would open a route
for regular gcc building[1] and testsuite runs.

MfG, JBG

[1] http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/
    http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/timeline.php
-- 
      Jan-Benedict Glaw      jbglaw%lug-owl.de@localhost              
+49-172-7608481
Signature of:                 Gib Dein Bestes. Dann übertriff Dich selbst!
the second  :

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index