Port-vax archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Bountysource campaign for gcc-vax
On 5/28/20 1:57 PM, Mouse wrote:
> (2) Not everyone _can_ "just [use] Github or Google" for
> authentication; not everyone who can is willing to risk it to something
> that sets off their "scam!" flags. And that's even assuming that doing
> so would work as well for them as it (apparently) does for you.
Why would anyone think it's a scam when the largest contributor is IBM?
Plus, we have previously successfully used Bountysource to support the
conversion of the m68k backend:
> https://www.bountysource.com/issues/80706251-m68k-convert-the-backend-to-mode_cc-so-it-can-be-kept-in-future-releases
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=6cebc6cbbb801183090dbb2752aa6b698331a31c
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=45a454883eef8acbdad75c0f376aaf22ec7416ff
>> I fully agree that the performance of the Bountysource website sucks.
>> But it's currently the only crowd-funding website that's known to
>> work well and trustable.
>
> Based on what I've seen here, it _doesn't_ work very well for some
> people. But then, it _is_ another instance of the "the Web is a
> suitable interface for anyone to anything" disease....
I don't know, I really don't know what to say here. If you prefer to rant
about Github and Google accounts and poor performance of websites instead
of moving the VAX port forward, then I haven't really anything to add.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz%debian.org@localhost
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz%physik.fu-berlin.de@localhost
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index