Port-vax archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Bountysource campaign for gcc-vax
Hi Maciej!
On 10/17/20 5:46 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> I now have a prototype implementation, with promising test results:
>
> === gcc Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes 110124
> # of unexpected failures 1852
> # of unexpected successes 7
> # of expected failures 566
> # of unresolved testcases 31
> # of unsupported tests 3131
>
> The 31 regressions are spread across 6 test cases, one of which looks like
> another incarnation of a preexisting problem:
Wow, I'm very excited to hear that. Great work!
> An announcement has now just been posted giving Nov 15th as the end of
> Stage 1 and consequently the deadline for general GCC 11 development:
>
> <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-October/234007.html>
>
> which means we're fully on track with this effort even for this deadline,
> though I'd consider this conversion a functional bug fix really, suitable
> for Stage 3 even.
From what I have heard, there have been no official announcements yet for the
removal of cc0 support. There have been some discussions but they died down
quickly so I guess we're still save.
The work on converting the AVR backend is moving along nicely as well, FWIW.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz%debian.org@localhost
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz%physik.fu-berlin.de@localhost
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index