--ghzN8eJ9Qlbqn3iT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

from the FAQ:

"Xen currently runs on the x86 architecture, but could in principle be
ported to others.In fact, it would have been rather easier to write
Xen for pretty much any other architecture as x86 is particularly=20
tricky to handle."

Shouldn't NetBSD/XEN be called something like NetBSD/XEN86, so that
e.g. a future XENamd64 would fit into the naming scheme?

Regards,
	-is

--ghzN8eJ9Qlbqn3iT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBQHKVqTCn4om+4LhpAQGNvggAkyK16dEEX59KfWyT4Ihy8mIXRxNpH2zN
lTsQ6iIiEsQ1EPOiY6Rgyfvh9d+7Eo6eyYk3HoRbL88lymYxRWhZzcIS4+rTgZ0c
YOXYj2fe1BqjymrUdPOKjIcSpxcK8ByzLdggBFgp2Bj4ang7BMItJgp5t2DshBqN
gbSHXB39OR8suWZW4hIuaVd6y5WVYFvVRARn5dVxPMffD7YQtwEqLQTZwAWq8TtU
EZior45CHgRSewRv6UOo/1VV+3ZRsrVyFj1O/9OzSu5ojtGIJYw6mWReEIGGBtcP
mY6NSk4QyziuiVLiXG0foN/NjAJiRVT27ppfHYYavF5VPC5pYn8CVw==
=vaQq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ghzN8eJ9Qlbqn3iT--