--vAlDtAs5WEb1aNYe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 04:59:40PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
[...]
> > Arguably, the interface should be
> > removed from the bridge at down time.
>=20
> It'll be removed anyway as it will be destroyed shortly after being put d=
own.
> Unless there's a bug in bridge(4) this shouldn't be needed.

Oh, I'm not worried about that.  I did quite a lot of nasty tests for
tap(4) while it was hooked to a bridge(4) and never went into trouble.
Well, never because of bridge(4) ;-)

It just seems cleaner.

--=20
Quentin Garnier - cube@cubidou.net - cube@NetBSD.org
"When I find the controls, I'll go where I like, I'll know where I want
to be, but maybe for now I'll stay right here on a silent sea."
KT Tunstall, Silent Sea, Eye to the Telescope, 2004.

--vAlDtAs5WEb1aNYe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBQjm5odgoQloHrPnoAQLj3wgAiCWWUcsj2pBIM9YDQDz9+BqG4wdOMkRn
0ErXWmq0+NMVHuMy8lee6JbBWPtTyD/i5ixvuqutXYdY+Lim94uU/+qXMyeEPOLo
dHXnf4KlxoqjKuMvWgYwPLUU3m9Wo4WZvhRVDoXFJnqws4dl4jpz9Cc1OtkWWXKw
HxZOJ+CpLmq+3beEyUlW014eJtrWcZN5PSGWythlhIsw2h/30NXzJI7/fcFfkdxz
5y4Kd+atVQ4Ek6/4Xhlw8DPBT/ICj2CjCBDnEHYckfP2ihNmxx15aw6xOtW2jNBG
rqFT7ZoVXkGuHYGlzwe2C1bHlR7jOtNxMG7iumiprcXXO7U0LqIUoQ==
=y9mL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--vAlDtAs5WEb1aNYe--