-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>>> Yes, this is the PCI hole. I've got the same issue with a i945.
>>> Despite the claim that the motherboard "supports" 4Gb and using a
>>> EM64T CPU,
>>> 768M were stolen for PCI. By playing with BIOS options, disabling
>>> all unused
>>> devices I trimmed this down to ~600M.
>>>
>>> In order to really use 4GB you need a i955X chipset.
>>
>> I have an i965 chipset and I also lose 768MB of 4GB to the PCI hole
>> (it's sort of ok, at least I was aware of it when deploying this
>> machine).
>
> With a 32bits or 64bits OS ? with 32bits, you won't see more than 4GB
> including the PCI hole anyway, even if the chipset supports  
> remaming the
> remaining RAM above 4GB.
>
>> However, my question is what would happen if I add more memory to the
>> machine. I.e. if I boost it to 8GB would I still only get 3.25GB for
>> Xen or would I get 7.25GB not having to bother about the hole in the
>> middle?
>
> NetBSD/Xen is still 32bits, so it's limited to 4GB.

That's what I feared. Yes, I understand that a 32bit OS is limited to  
4GB, but I thought that perhaps the Xen hypervisor had no such  
restrictions and as long as dom0 and all domU's where small enough it  
might work. But then I've also seen the discussions about PAE and  
page table structures having to be the same between hypervisor, dom0  
and domU, so I'm not surprised, really.

Ho hum. I suspect this will bite me hard around the end of the year.  
Oh, well.

Johan

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iQCVAwUBRifOGvotlDfa2H4ZAQI7oQQAp2AQOck6g3QW7Jjj73ADqjIA8HMJ0ss0
MzY0M9e0KrsE7pwNmW/dXK3A9+nKS/uZV+1PrFjYa0j3VUfsgVDqeMI8nfQeESOS
FRBlngMyk+0Q1atty+wNYM8es090rIa29SfA6FJiz0bJchJMItE5zKin21F2QhCh
GJa/K36MleQ=
=0l90
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----