--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 11:14:33AM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:32:23PM +0200, Mark Weinem wrote:
> >=20
> > btw, what's on your actual roadmap about Xen?
>=20
> My next big item is Xen on amd64. But I've not really started looking at =
it
> yet.

Perhaps a bit smaller, and perhaps just as useful ...

I hear that a AMD64/64-bit Xen 3.1 hypervisor can now run 32-bit
(but only PAE-enabled ones AIUI) domUs.  So, while I don't have
hardware that can make use of PAE, I can see how some VPS providers
would be more willing to consider NetBSD domUs if they could run
them on their current platform (be it IA-32+PAE or AMD64).
And really, I don't need a 64-bit domU, at least not yet.

But, now that I think about it, having a NetBSD/amd64+xen dom0
for development of this might be handy too.  Whatever, it's all
progress.

	Jonathan Kollasch

--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFGec4UOjx1ye3hmokRAldTAJ4xV+jINBbTRzZp7o/l87OuUz+UZgCfdLfn
tGWwaZ0HDvMDPHG5/1YWSvA=
=Eia+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM--