Subject: Re: xen 3.1 problem (Re: xen 3.1.0 is there)
To: Kazushi Marukawa <jam@pobox.com>
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
List: port-xen
Date: 06/29/2007 10:23:24
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 08:00:57AM +0900, Kazushi Marukawa wrote:
>    On Jun 28, 18:54, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>    > Subject: Re: xen 3.1 problem (Re: xen 3.1.0 is there)
>    > On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 10:44:20PM +0900, Kazushi Marukawa wrote:
>    > > It's a part of idutils package, devel/idutils.  This mkid
>    > > parses all .c, .h, .s files and creates a tag file named
>    > > 'ID'.  It is not a benchmark program but it acceses files
>    > > and it spends about 10 secs once files are cached on 512M
>    > > memory allocated for DomU.  I'm not sure it is suitable to
>    > > evaluate the system or not for our case, though.  It was
>    > > just handy.  ;-)
>    > 
>    > OK, so here's what I get. All this with a dom0 kernel from today + my
>    > interrupt patches:
>    > 4.99.21                   8.54 real         7.63 user         0.89 sys
>    > 4.99.21 + my patches:     8.52 real         7.39 user         1.06 sys
>    > current 06220000Z         8.43 real         7.47 user         0.94 sys
>    > 4.0_BETA2                 8.33 real         7.49 user         0.81 sys
> 
> Is it possible to run the same program on domU too?

This was all on domU. My comment on dom0 was to point out that all the
tests were run with the same dom0 kernel (otherwise there would be 16
results instead of 4 :)

-- 
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI.           Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--