Re: CVS commit: src/sys/rump/librump/rumpkern

[Antti Kantee <pooka%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Wed Jun 23 2010 at 12:39:17 +0100, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> Well, when I tried ./build.sh rumptest, it gave me this:
> 
> --- dependall-dev ---
> WARNING: pseudo-root is an experimental feature
> /home/netbsd/src/sys/rump/dev/lib/libaudio/AUDIO.ioconf:8: audiobus*: unknown 
> device `audiobus'
> /home/netbsd/src/sys/rump/dev/lib/libaudio/AUDIO.ioconf:10: `audio* at 
> audiobus?' is orphaned (nothing matching `audiobus?' found)
> *** Stop.
> *** [ioconf.c] Error code 1
> 1 error
> 
> nbmake: stopped in /home/netbsd/src/sys/rump/dev/lib/libaudio
> *** [dependall-libaudio] Error code 2
> 1 error
> 
> Can you elaborate why, and how to get it working?

I suspect your config(1) is too old and config should whine about it.
At least my nb5 config displays the appropriate error for -current
sources:

WARNING: ioconf is an experimental feature
/sys/conf/files:4: your sources require a newer version of config(1) -- please 
rebuild it.
/sys/conf/majors:12: syntax error
/sys/conf/majors:13: syntax error
/sys/conf/majors:15: syntax error
/sys/conf/majors:18: syntax error
/sys/conf/majors:19: syntax error
/sys/conf/majors:21: syntax error
/sys/conf/majors:25: syntax error
/sys/conf/majors:26: syntax error
/sys/conf/majors:27: syntax error
/sys/conf/majors:28: syntax error
/sys/conf/majors:29: syntax error
/sys/conf/majors:30: syntax error
/sys/conf/majors:33: syntax error
/sys/conf/majors:37: syntax error
/sys/conf/majors:41: syntax error
/sys/conf/majors:43: syntax error
WARNING: pseudo-root is an experimental feature
AUDIO.ioconf:8: audiobus*: unknown device `audiobus'
AUDIO.ioconf:10: `audio* at audiobus?' is orphaned (nothing matching 
`audiobus?' found)
*** Stop.

Guessing from the log you pasted and that the bottom matches my too-old
config's error reportable, you were bit by -j output and did not see
the real error message.

Try upgrading your tools and if the problem persists, let me know.

> Other than rump, it was tested.

The point was more that you did not make an effort to run the regression
test suite.  (anyway, it's done now, and the commits come out clean.
thanks for the features)