Source-Changes-D archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 09:51:00PM +0200, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> > > A related note: should we provide typeof(3) in the restricted namespace
> > > instead, i.e. as __typeof(3)?
> >
> > People are more likely to find the page if it's installed as
> > typeof(3), I think, since that's how they'll think of it, and if
> > necessary the page can include discussion of when it's an available
> > symbol.
>
> No, I mean shouldn't this be defined conditionally in cdefs(3)? But
> as typeof(3) can not be replaced by another compiler-agnostic
> construct (?), probably not.
Oh, I see. It might be desirable but as it's a language extension I'm
not sure we get that degree of control.
However, since AFAICR typeof is fairly likely to appear in c1x,
probably many compilers will eventually supply it.
--
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index