Re: /var/lock

[David Holland <dholland-sourcechanges%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 02:09:16AM +0300, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
 > > Anyway, the reason this whole thread started out with /var/lock is
 > > that the Linux world apparently also did this with /var/spool/lock.
 > 
 > But our /var/spool/lock is specifically uucp's lockdir (uucp/daemon).
 > Creating lvm subdir beneath is (owned by operator) feels monumentally
 > gross.

Bleh. Yeah, ok, I dunno then. Adding /var/lock seems like a decent
approach (and maybe we should get rid of /var/spool/lock, since we
removed base uucp quite a whle back...)

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost