Re: CVS commit: src/tools

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 07:34:50AM +0000, Alan Barrett wrote:
> Module Name:	src
> Committed By:	apb
> Date:		Tue Sep 30 07:34:50 UTC 2014
> 
> Modified Files:
> 	src/tools: README
> 
> Log Message:
> Say that tools should use C89, not C99;

Given the state of the toolchain with effectively requiring C++ for both
GCC 4.8 and Clang, does this really still make sense? The only relevant
semi-modern toolchain I can think of without C99 support is MSVC and we
don't support that anyway.

Joerg