Source-Changes-D archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src/sys/kern
Hi Tyler,
On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 11:46:05PM +0000, Tyler R. Retzlaff wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: rtr
> Date: Sat May 2 23:46:04 UTC 2015
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/kern: uipc_socket.c
>
> Log Message:
> compare mbuf * pointer to NULL instead of 0
> @@ -941,7 +941,7 @@ sosend(struct socket *so, struct mbuf *a
> error = ENOTCONN;
> goto release;
> }
> - } else if (addr == 0) {
> + } else if (NULL == addr) {
I really appreciate what you're doing with the mbuf conversion work.
Having said that, I absolutely loathe the "NULL == addr" style of
writing comparisons - it was introduced when compilers were stupid
enough to think that a mistyped "var = value" could be misinterpreted
as a conditional statement like "var == value". That hasn't
been the case for a long while. Semantically it's ass backwards, it
doesn't follow the conventions that the other comparisons in this file
make, and it's ugly, and I now have to parse the individual operation,
rather than reading the code as a whole :-(.
Anyway, please don't get me wrong, I really like the movement away
from mbufs in the networking code, it's good - just don't see the
point in using this unconventional way of expressing conditionals.
Best,
Alistair
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index