On 09.01.2017 05:06, Christos Zoulas wrote: > On Jan 9, 4:40am, n54%gmx.com@localhost (Kamil Rytarowski) wrote: > -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/kern > > | It's almost 5 years since commenting out - I assumed that it will rot to > | the point that it might need to be rewritten. A reminder could be added > | to roadmap and the code is still there in code history. > | > | But if there is a request, I will revert it. > > But neither the API or the ABI or something that is related to that > code to cause it to rot has changed... If there was a change that would > make it not compile anymore I would understand why it was removed... > But it was just sitting there hurting nothing :-) > > christos > I'm testing and analyzing proper tracing of vfork events also around the removed code fragments (even if new code might be in other place) and testing this ifdef is ouf scope of my work - unless someone will make it enabled and eventually fixed. Getting rid of it reduces the complexity (at least for my eyes). If there is a request to add it to TODO/roadmap or to back it out, I will do it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature