On 17/01/2018 01:57, maya%netbsd.org@localhost wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 06:35:08PM -0600, David Young wrote:I have said it before, that I do think the "concept architecture" of 802.11 VAP is rather broken, but let's be honest: nobody, especially not I, have had the time in 10+ years to independently implement anything comparable. *shrug*What is your issue with VAPs?
My main beef with early VAP implementations is that the user had to create a VAP from the physical interface/radio just to get client association working.
Thankfully those days have now passed it seems. But frankly it's just easier to get another interface/radio. Roy