On 02.01.2019 02:52, Roy Marples wrote: > On 01/01/2019 21:30, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: >> Joerg seems to just want to play with Clang out of the LLVM projects, >> deteriorating experience with the rest blocking this patch. Other people >> need more than that. > > I can see both sides here, and it seems that our repository is split the > same way - we have src and xsrc. > > While I whole heartedly agree to strict rules in src maintaining (at > substancial cost) ABI, does xsrc have the same rules as it's really an > external project to NetBSD? > We keep bumping ABI for libraries for external projects such as OpenSSL, I don't see any difference with LLVM here. Exporting LLVM/CLANG/etc libraries does not mean that ordinary programs prebuilt with Clang will stop working on version bump. > Would it be possible to push the needed parts of LLVM needed for MESA et > all to xsrc? > I intend to treat the MESA case as orthogonal to LLVM. And on an unrelated note we could just merge xsrc into src/, it's not longer heavier compared to a copy of GNU and LLVM toolchains. > Roy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature