Source-Changes-D archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: CVS commit: src/external/bsd/blacklist/bin



On 11/03/2020 15:12, Christos Zoulas wrote:
In article <20200311023318.C6A7FFB28%cvs.NetBSD.org@localhost>,
Roy Marples <source-changes-d%NetBSD.org@localhost> wrote:
-=-=-=-=-=-

Module Name:	src
Committed By:	roy
Date:		Wed Mar 11 02:33:18 UTC 2020

Modified Files:
	src/external/bsd/blacklist/bin: blacklistd.c

Log Message:
blacklist: Don't remove a ruleset if we have already added it

The noted argument is wrong - if it's already been deleted then the id we
have for it is invalid.
Because we don't track deletions to the ruleset, working it out is
problematic at best.

Instead, if we have already added the rule treat it as a non-op.

This is a valid use case because we might receive a burst of messages
in the downstream application for the same address and process them
one by one. It's not the job of the downstream application to track
blacklistd state.

The comment was correct. You need to consider the case where someone
manually deleted the rule directly from the packet filter. The
database will think it is there, but now you'll never add it again.

If we just re-add the rule, we should either get an error that it already exists which we should gracefully handle or it just overwrites the existing rule.
I don't see the point in deleting something which by your logic is already deleted.

Roy


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index