Source-Changes-D archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
re: CVS commit: src/external/gpl3
> Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 11:46:29 +1100
> From: matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>
> Message-ID: <15233.1585356389%splode.eterna.com.au@localhost>
>
> | can we just leave this as-is and let netbsd GCC people care?
>
> Only if the GCC people do care, and understand the issue, and
> implement what we want....
note i said "netbsd GCC people". i mean me, specifically.
this discussion has wasted more of my time than i would
need for decades to maintain the libiberty patch, which
_is_ about using /tmp over others by default. (it just
doesn't work when P_tmpdir overrides it.)
> -rw------- 1 root wheel 0 Jun 15 2019 /var/tmp/cc0SLuqk.c
[ ... ]
> -rw------- 1 root wheel 0 Jul 10 2019 /var/tmp/ccyxx75H.o
yes, this is due to P_tmpdir on older netbsd trees. we
should probably pullup my fix to stdio.h. (note this
only affects netbsd hosts -- must upgrade your installed
system's stdio.h to get this fix. other systems either
don't define P_tmpdir or define it to "/tmp".)
we want both changes (libiberty, and my stdio.h/P_tmpdir
change.) we want to support old netbsd, non-netbsd, ..
whatever build hosts.
> And: mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost said (in a different message):
> | i don't like this "don't care about netbsd-8" feeling i'm hearing
>
> I think you took Martin's words out of context. I read that as
> applying only to where gcc puts its temp files in NetBSD-8 (which is
> the wrong place, on NetBSD anyway) - but which, after several years
> of doing that, is not exactly crucial to fix (and is the kind of
> churn that isn't wanted or needed for supposedly stable systems).
it wasn't martin was replying about here. i'd seen two
messages (not from martin) that dismissed problems in
netbsd-8 a moment earlier. i don't want that to be a
general feeling in the project is all.
.mrg.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index