Source-Changes-D archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src/sys
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 11:55:46AM +0200, J. Hannken-Illjes wrote:
> > On 10. Oct 2023, at 20:58, Andrew Doran <ad%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 06:00:57PM +0200, J. Hannken-Illjes wrote:
> >
> >>> cvs rdiff -u -r1.63 -r1.64 src/sys/kern/sys_select.c
> >>
> >> - sleepq_unsleep(l, false);
> >> + sleepq_remove(l->l_sleepq, l, true);
> >> }
> >> }
> >> mutex_spin_exit(lock);
> >>
> >> Looks like sleepq_remove() unlocks l->l_mutex == lock and
> >> then mutex_spin_exit(lock) will unlock an unlocked mutex.
> >
> > lock is held before the call to sleepq_remove() and this is also true at the
> > time: l->l_mutex == lock.
> >
> > After the call lock is still held, but now l->l_mutex != lock, because l has
> > changed state (e.g LSSLEEP -> LSRUN) which causes l_mutex to change in
> > concert. There is a rough overview here:
> >
> > https://nxr.netbsd.org/xref/src/sys/kern/kern_lwp.c#156
> >
> > Did you encounter a problem?
>
> This is not true for RUMP. Hero you added sleepq_remove() as
> "sleepq_unsleep(l, true)". This will unlock l_mutex without changing.
>
> Just poking around and using sleepq_unsleep(l, false) here makes the
> NFS tests using rump_server pass.
Ah, now I see, thank you. I committed a fix and will do a test run once my
build completes.
Cheers,
Andrew
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index