[src/nick-nhusb]: src/sys/dev/usb Update a comment

[skrll <skrll%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

details:   https://anonhg.NetBSD.org/src/rev/02000993703c
branches:  nick-nhusb
changeset: 334085:02000993703c
user:      skrll <skrll%NetBSD.org@localhost>
date:      Fri Dec 19 09:52:35 2014 +0000

description:
Update a comment

diffstat:

 sys/dev/usb/usbdivar.h |  18 +++++++++---------
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diffs (40 lines):

diff -r b3df8fc7407b -r 02000993703c sys/dev/usb/usbdivar.h
--- a/sys/dev/usb/usbdivar.h    Sun Dec 14 11:16:29 2014 +0000
+++ b/sys/dev/usb/usbdivar.h    Fri Dec 19 09:52:35 2014 +0000
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/*     $NetBSD: usbdivar.h,v 1.109.2.9 2014/12/14 11:16:29 skrll Exp $ */
+/*     $NetBSD: usbdivar.h,v 1.109.2.10 2014/12/19 09:52:35 skrll Exp $        */
 
 /*
  * Copyright (c) 1998, 2012 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
  * List of hardware interface methods, and whether the lock is held
  * when each is called by this module:
  *
- *     BUS METHOD              LOCK  NOTES
+ *     BUS METHOD              LOCK    NOTES
  *     ----------------------- ------- -------------------------
  *     ubm_open                -       might want to take lock?
  *     ubm_softint             x
@@ -49,14 +49,14 @@
  *     ubm_newdev              -       Will take lock
        ubm_rhctrl              
  *
- *     PIPE METHOD             LOCK  NOTES
+ *     PIPE METHOD             LOCK    NOTES
  *     ----------------------- ------- -------------------------
- *     transfer                -
- *     start                   -       might want to take lock?
- *     abort                   x
- *     close                   x
- *     cleartoggle             -
- *     done                    x
+ *     upm_transfer            -
+ *     upm_start               -       might want to take lock?
+ *     upm_abort               x
+ *     upm_close               x
+ *     upm_cleartoggle         -
+ *     upm_done                x
  *
  * The above semantics are likely to change.  Little performance
  * evaluation has been done on this code and the locking strategy.