Source-Changes-HG archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
[src/trunk]: src/dist/pf/etc Synchronise with r1.27 from OpenBSD
details: https://anonhg.NetBSD.org/src/rev/ac0e0d7c3e4e
branches: trunk
changeset: 358181:ac0e0d7c3e4e
user: sevan <sevan%NetBSD.org@localhost>
date: Sat Dec 16 07:36:26 2017 +0000
description:
Synchronise with r1.27 from OpenBSD
diffstat:
dist/pf/etc/pf.os | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diffs (66 lines):
diff -r 40a037ea9c96 -r ac0e0d7c3e4e dist/pf/etc/pf.os
--- a/dist/pf/etc/pf.os Sat Dec 16 07:16:03 2017 +0000
+++ b/dist/pf/etc/pf.os Sat Dec 16 07:36:26 2017 +0000
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-# $NetBSD: pf.os,v 1.3 2008/06/18 09:06:25 yamt Exp $
-# $OpenBSD: pf.os,v 1.21 2006/07/28 21:51:12 david Exp $
+# $NetBSD: pf.os,v 1.4 2017/12/16 07:36:26 sevan Exp $
+# $OpenBSD: pf.os,v 1.27 2016/09/03 17:08:57 sthen Exp $
# passive OS fingerprinting
# -------------------------
#
@@ -226,7 +226,13 @@
S3:64:1:60:M*,S,T,N,W0: Linux:2.4:.18-21:Linux 2.4.18 and newer
S4:64:1:60:M*,S,T,N,W0: Linux:2.4::Linux 2.4/2.6 <= 2.6.7
S4:64:1:60:M*,S,T,N,W0: Linux:2.6:.1-7:Linux 2.4/2.6 <= 2.6.7
-S4:64:1:60:M*,S,T,N,W7: Linux:2.6:8:Linux 2.6.8 and newer (?)
+
+S4:64:1:60:M*,S,T,N,W5: Linux:2.6::Linux 2.6 (newer, 1)
+S4:64:1:60:M*,S,T,N,W6: Linux:2.6::Linux 2.6 (newer, 2)
+S4:64:1:60:M*,S,T,N,W7: Linux:2.6::Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
+T4:64:1:60:M*,S,T,N,W7: Linux:2.6::Linux 2.6 (newer, 4)
+
+S10:64:1:60:M*,S,T,N,W4: Linux:3.0::Linux 3.0
S3:64:1:60:M*,S,T,N,W1: Linux:2.5::Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4)
S4:64:1:60:M*,S,T,N,W1: Linux:2.5-2.6::Linux 2.5/2.6
@@ -299,13 +305,19 @@
# ----------------- OpenBSD -----------------
16384:64:0:60:M*,N,W0,N,N,T: OpenBSD:2.6::NetBSD 1.3 (or OpenBSD 2.6)
-16384:64:1:64:M*,N,N,S,N,W0,N,N,T: OpenBSD:3.0-4.0::OpenBSD 3.0-4.0
-16384:64:0:64:M*,N,N,S,N,W0,N,N,T: OpenBSD:3.0-4.0:no-df:OpenBSD 3.0-4.0 (scrub no-df)
+16384:64:1:64:M*,N,N,S,N,W0,N,N,T: OpenBSD:3.0-4.8::OpenBSD 3.0-4.8
+16384:64:0:64:M*,N,N,S,N,W0,N,N,T: OpenBSD:3.0-4.8:no-df:OpenBSD 3.0-4.8 (scrub no-df)
57344:64:1:64:M*,N,N,S,N,W0,N,N,T: OpenBSD:3.3-4.0::OpenBSD 3.3-4.0
57344:64:0:64:M*,N,N,S,N,W0,N,N,T: OpenBSD:3.3-4.0:no-df:OpenBSD 3.3-4.0 (scrub no-df)
65535:64:1:64:M*,N,N,S,N,W0,N,N,T: OpenBSD:3.0-4.0:opera:OpenBSD 3.0-4.0 (Opera)
+16384:64:1:64:M*,N,N,S,N,W3,N,N,T: OpenBSD:4.9::OpenBSD 4.9
+16384:64:0:64:M*,N,N,S,N,W3,N,N,T: OpenBSD:4.9:no-df:OpenBSD 4.9 (scrub no-df)
+
+16384:64:1:64:M*,N,N,S,N,W6,N,N,T: OpenBSD:6.1::OpenBSD 6.1
+16384:64:0:64:M*,N,N,S,N,W6,N,N,T: OpenBSD:6.1:no-df:OpenBSD 6.1 (scrub no-df)
+
# ----------------- Solaris -----------------
S17:64:1:64:N,W3,N,N,T0,N,N,S,M*: Solaris:8:RFC1323:Solaris 8 RFC1323
@@ -362,7 +374,7 @@
# ----------------- Windows -----------------
# Windows TCP/IP stack is a mess. For most recent XP, 2000 and
-# even 98, the pathlevel, not the actual OS version, is more
+# even 98, the patchlevel, not the actual OS version, is more
# relevant to the signature. They share the same code, so it would
# seem. Luckily for us, almost all Windows 9x boxes have an
# awkward MSS of 536, which I use to tell one from another
@@ -426,6 +438,8 @@
32767:128:1:48:M*,N,N,S: Windows:2000:SP4:Windows SP1, 2000 SP4
32767:128:1:48:M*,N,N,S: Windows:XP:SP1:Windows SP1, 2000 SP4
+8192:128:1:52:M*,N,W2,N,N,S: Windows:Vista::Windows Vista/7
+
# Odds, ends, mods:
S52:128:1:48:M1260,N,N,S: Windows:2000:cisco:Windows XP/2000 via Cisco
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index