Source-Changes-HG archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

[src/netbsd-1-6]: src/doc note pullup of tickets 1652 through 1657.



details:   https://anonhg.NetBSD.org/src/rev/1cccf4a7f5db
branches:  netbsd-1-6
changeset: 531250:1cccf4a7f5db
user:      grant <grant%NetBSD.org@localhost>
date:      Tue Apr 06 09:48:19 2004 +0000

description:
note pullup of tickets 1652 through 1657.

diffstat:

 doc/CHANGES-1.6.3 |  34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diffs (45 lines):

diff -r 44790e872644 -r 1cccf4a7f5db doc/CHANGES-1.6.3
--- a/doc/CHANGES-1.6.3 Tue Apr 06 09:41:54 2004 +0000
+++ b/doc/CHANGES-1.6.3 Tue Apr 06 09:48:19 2004 +0000
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-#      $NetBSD: CHANGES-1.6.3,v 1.1.2.67 2004/04/06 08:00:37 tron Exp $
+#      $NetBSD: CHANGES-1.6.3,v 1.1.2.68 2004/04/06 09:48:19 grant Exp $
 
 A complete list of changes from NetBSD 1.6.2 to NetBSD 1.6.3:
 
@@ -421,3 +421,35 @@
        Closes PR#25010.
        [enami, ticket #1658]
 
+usr.sbin/rpc.lockd/lockd_lock.c                        1.12
+
+       - protect from pid reusing.
+       - fix a null dereference on the error.
+       [bouyer, ticket #1654]
+
+usr.sbin/rpc.lockd/lockd_lock.c                        1.13
+
+       for fork'ed children, use _exit instead of exit.
+       [bouyer, ticket #1652]
+
+usr.sbin/rpc.lockd/lockd_lock.c                        1.17
+
+       for lock/unlock requests, log svid as well as client name.
+       [bouyer, ticket #1653]
+
+usr.sbin/rpc.lockd/lockd_lock.c                        patch
+
+       getlock: detect duplicated locks slightly correctly.
+       XXX how should we do for byte range lock?
+       [bouyer, ticket #1655]
+
+usr.sbin/rpc.statd/statd.c                     1.22
+
+       reset_host: reset actual host infos rather than reset copies of them.
+       [bouyer, ticket #1656]
+
+usr.sbin/rpc.statd/statd.c                     1.23
+
+       init_file: copy status_info from static storage so that
+       statd doesn't always use the same "status" number.
+       [bouyer, ticket #1657]



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index