Source-Changes-HG archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
[src/trunk]: src change the updating note to say you may need fsck_ffs -b 32 ...
details: https://anonhg.NetBSD.org/src/rev/356fc2687c45
branches: trunk
changeset: 557583:356fc2687c45
user: dbj <dbj%NetBSD.org@localhost>
date: Mon Jan 12 16:19:19 2004 +0000
description:
change the updating note to say you may need fsck_ffs -b 32 -c 4'
diffstat:
UPDATING | 5 +++--
sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diffs (46 lines):
diff -r 3524383ece96 -r 356fc2687c45 UPDATING
--- a/UPDATING Mon Jan 12 14:31:46 2004 +0000
+++ b/UPDATING Mon Jan 12 16:19:19 2004 +0000
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-$NetBSD: UPDATING,v 1.103 2004/01/12 05:01:22 dbj Exp $
+$NetBSD: UPDATING,v 1.104 2004/01/12 16:19:19 dbj Exp $
This file is intended to be a brief introduction to the build
process and a reference on what to do if something doesn't work.
@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@
when using those layouts. If you have been using -current
since 20030402, you may find that fsck again signals fatal
superblock mismatches. To work around, you can use
- fsck_ffs -b 32 to restore an alternate superblock.
+ fsck_ffs -b 32 -c 4 to restore an alternate superblock
+ and complete the filesystem upgrade.
20031203:
New binutils builds may fail due to old dependencies.
diff -r 3524383ece96 -r 356fc2687c45 sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c
--- a/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c Mon Jan 12 14:31:46 2004 +0000
+++ b/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c Mon Jan 12 16:19:19 2004 +0000
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $NetBSD: ffs_vfsops.c,v 1.133 2004/01/12 05:49:03 dbj Exp $ */
+/* $NetBSD: ffs_vfsops.c,v 1.134 2004/01/12 16:19:36 dbj Exp $ */
/*
* Copyright (c) 1989, 1991, 1993, 1994
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
*/
#include <sys/cdefs.h>
-__KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: ffs_vfsops.c,v 1.133 2004/01/12 05:49:03 dbj Exp $");
+__KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: ffs_vfsops.c,v 1.134 2004/01/12 16:19:36 dbj Exp $");
#if defined(_KERNEL_OPT)
#include "opt_ffs.h"
@@ -976,7 +976,7 @@
"Test your filesystem by running fsck_ffs -n -f on it.\n"
"If it reports:\n"
"``VALUES IN SUPER BLOCK DISAGREE WITH THOSE IN FIRST ALTERNATE''\n"
- "you should be able to recover with fsck_ffs -f -b 32\n"
+ "you should be able to recover with fsck_ffs -b 32 -c 4\n"
"See the file src/UPDATING or\n"
"http://mail-index.netbsd.org/current-users/2004/01/11/0022.html\n"
"for more details\n",
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index