Source-Changes-HG archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
[src/trunk]: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1 lint: fix and document test for il...
details: https://anonhg.NetBSD.org/src/rev/321de059767f
branches: trunk
changeset: 949136:321de059767f
user: rillig <rillig%NetBSD.org@localhost>
date: Sat Jan 02 16:12:39 2021 +0000
description:
lint: fix and document test for illegal bit-fields
The _Complex bit-field should have been commented out.
diffstat:
tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_035.c | 12 ++++++++++--
tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_035.exp | 24 ++++++++++++------------
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diffs (64 lines):
diff -r bec479f05a9e -r 321de059767f tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_035.c
--- a/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_035.c Sat Jan 02 15:55:54 2021 +0000
+++ b/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_035.c Sat Jan 02 16:12:39 2021 +0000
@@ -1,8 +1,17 @@
-/* $NetBSD: msg_035.c,v 1.2 2021/01/02 15:55:54 rillig Exp $ */
+/* $NetBSD: msg_035.c,v 1.3 2021/01/02 16:12:39 rillig Exp $ */
# 3 "msg_035.c"
// Test for message: illegal bit-field type [35]
+/*
+ * In traditional C, only unsigned int is a portable bit-field type.
+ *
+ * In C89, only int, signed int and unsigned int are allowed (3.5.2.1p7).
+ *
+ * In C99 and C11, only _Bool, signed int and unsigned int are allowed,
+ * plus implementation-defined types (6.7.2.1p5).
+ */
+
typedef struct {
int dummy;
} example_struct;
@@ -46,7 +55,6 @@
unsigned int array_flag[4]: 1;
example_function function_flag: 1;
// FIXME: aborts: _Complex complex_flag: 1;
- _Complex complex_flag: 1;
float _Complex float_complex_flag: 1;
double _Complex double_complex_flag: 1;
long double _Complex long_double_complex_flag: 1;
diff -r bec479f05a9e -r 321de059767f tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_035.exp
--- a/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_035.exp Sat Jan 02 15:55:54 2021 +0000
+++ b/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_035.exp Sat Jan 02 16:12:39 2021 +0000
@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@
-msg_035.c(24): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
-msg_035.c(32): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
msg_035.c(33): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
-msg_035.c(34): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
-msg_035.c(35): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
-msg_035.c(38): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
-msg_035.c(39): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
-msg_035.c(40): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
-msg_035.c(41): void type for void_flag [19]
-msg_035.c(41): zero size bit-field [37]
+msg_035.c(41): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
msg_035.c(42): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
msg_035.c(43): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
-msg_035.c(45): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
-msg_035.c(46): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
+msg_035.c(44): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
msg_035.c(47): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
+msg_035.c(48): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
msg_035.c(49): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
-msg_035.c(50): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
+msg_035.c(50): void type for void_flag [19]
+msg_035.c(50): zero size bit-field [37]
msg_035.c(51): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
+msg_035.c(52): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
+msg_035.c(54): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
+msg_035.c(55): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
+msg_035.c(56): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
+msg_035.c(58): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
+msg_035.c(59): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
+msg_035.c(60): warning: illegal bit-field type [35]
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index