Source-Changes-HG archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
[src/trunk]: src/usr.bin/tsort tsort: fix typo in comment
details: https://anonhg.NetBSD.org/src/rev/f4c9685f3496
branches: trunk
changeset: 951575:f4c9685f3496
user: dbj <dbj%NetBSD.org@localhost>
date: Sat Feb 06 16:02:16 2021 +0000
description:
tsort: fix typo in comment
diffstat:
usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diffs (27 lines):
diff -r 011f6deaee85 -r f4c9685f3496 usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c
--- a/usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c Sat Feb 06 13:58:09 2021 +0000
+++ b/usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c Sat Feb 06 16:02:16 2021 +0000
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $NetBSD: tsort.c,v 1.25 2020/08/17 16:26:03 christos Exp $ */
+/* $NetBSD: tsort.c,v 1.26 2021/02/06 16:02:16 dbj Exp $ */
/*
* Copyright (c) 1989, 1993, 1994
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
#if 0
static char sccsid[] = "@(#)tsort.c 8.3 (Berkeley) 5/4/95";
#endif
-__RCSID("$NetBSD: tsort.c,v 1.25 2020/08/17 16:26:03 christos Exp $");
+__RCSID("$NetBSD: tsort.c,v 1.26 2021/02/06 16:02:16 dbj Exp $");
#endif /* not lint */
#include <sys/types.h>
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
*
* Should be compatible with AT&T tsort HOWEVER the output is not identical
* (i.e. for most graphs there is more than one sorted order, and this tsort
- * usually generates a different one then the AT&T tsort). Also, cycle
+ * usually generates a different one than the AT&T tsort). Also, cycle
* reporting seems to be more accurate in this version (the AT&T tsort
* sometimes says a node is in a cycle when it isn't).
*
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index