[src/trunk]: src/usr.bin/tsort tsort: fix typo in comment

[dbj <dbj%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

details:   https://anonhg.NetBSD.org/src/rev/392b71b6b24f
branches:  trunk
changeset: 980490:392b71b6b24f
user:      dbj <dbj%NetBSD.org@localhost>
date:      Sat Feb 06 16:02:16 2021 +0000

description:
tsort: fix typo in comment

diffstat:

 usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c |  6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diffs (27 lines):

diff -r fc0512b44a05 -r 392b71b6b24f usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c
--- a/usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c     Sat Feb 06 13:58:09 2021 +0000
+++ b/usr.bin/tsort/tsort.c     Sat Feb 06 16:02:16 2021 +0000
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/*     $NetBSD: tsort.c,v 1.25 2020/08/17 16:26:03 christos Exp $      */
+/*     $NetBSD: tsort.c,v 1.26 2021/02/06 16:02:16 dbj Exp $   */
 
 /*
  * Copyright (c) 1989, 1993, 1994
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
 #if 0
 static char sccsid[] = "@(#)tsort.c    8.3 (Berkeley) 5/4/95";
 #endif
-__RCSID("$NetBSD: tsort.c,v 1.25 2020/08/17 16:26:03 christos Exp $");
+__RCSID("$NetBSD: tsort.c,v 1.26 2021/02/06 16:02:16 dbj Exp $");
 #endif /* not lint */
 
 #include <sys/types.h>
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
  *
  *  Should be compatible with AT&T tsort HOWEVER the output is not identical
  *  (i.e. for most graphs there is more than one sorted order, and this tsort
- *  usually generates a different one then the AT&T tsort).  Also, cycle
+ *  usually generates a different one than the AT&T tsort).  Also, cycle
  *  reporting seems to be more accurate in this version (the AT&T tsort
  *  sometimes says a node is in a cycle when it isn't).
  *