>>>>> On Thu, 16 May 1996 15:07:22 -0400,
	Chris G Demetriou <Chris_G_Demetriou@ux2.sp.cs.cmu.edu> said:

>> > > Was there a reason for choosing different terminology then FreeBSD
>> > > for this?

>> You've trying to tell me that 'SIMPLEQ' is somehow more inherenty
>> beautiful and understandable as a single-linked list than SLIST and
>> STAILQ?

> Actually, yes (at least for "beautiful," if you interpret that as
> "consistent with the other names").

Just a question.

FreeBSD has singly-linked version of LIST, and call it SLIST.
What is a suitable name for it ?

	doubly linked	singly linked
			FreeBSD		NetBSD
	--------------	--------------	-------------
	LIST		SLIST		?
	TAILQ		STAILQ		SIMPLEQ
	CIRCLEQ		? (*)		?

	(*) may be SCIRCLEQ, if it is needed.
--
soda@sra.co.jp		Software Research Associates, Inc., Japan
(Noriyuki Soda)		   software tools and technology group