On Wed, 15 Jul 1998 23:10:53 -0400 (EDT) 
 woods@most.weird.com (Greg A. Woods) wrote:

 > A *perl* script?!?!?
 > 
 > Csh would be bad enough, but Perl?!?!?
 > 
 > So far as I know NetBSD still doesn't come with perl by default.  Yes, I
 > realize that only "developers" will ever really need to run this thing,
 > but still....

Um, there's precedent for using perl (gcc script uses perl, I think the
amd one does, too)

Eventually, I'd like to see us switch to something more like I did w/
sup for third-party packages ("source" subdir, w/ .PATH directives).

Jason R. Thorpe                                       thorpej@nas.nasa.gov
NASA Ames Research Center                            Home: +1 408 866 1912
NAS: M/S 258-5                                       Work: +1 650 604 0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035                             Pager: +1 650 940 5942