On Mon, 26 Oct 1998 23:59:14 -0500  "Perry E. Metzger" wrote:

> shouldn't this simply be consistant with ls(1)?

Yes and no - I looked at this, but ls(1) has some smarts to autosize
columns which is really not practical in find(1) without parsing the
whole tree and then redisplaying everything.  So I just went for column
widths that suit the types of files we have around here...

Simon.
--
> Simon Burge writes:
> > Module Name:	src
> > Committed By:	simonb
> > Date:		Tue Oct 27 04:53:03 UTC 1998
> > 
> > Modified Files:
> > 	src/usr.bin/find: ls.c
> > Log Message:
> > For -ls output, change field widths to allow inodes up to 9,999,999 and
> > file sizes up to 999,999,999 bytes (and 999,999 blocks) without wobbly
> > lines.  Also change device minor/major to be 3/5 digits (current maximum
> > is 4/7 digits - the 3/5 split is arbitary).