woods@most.weird.com (Greg A. Woods) writes:

> Personally speaking I much prefer the *2netbsd way of doing things over
> the dist/* way.  It's much more elegant, much easier to understand and
> is far more consistent (with all the rest of the system).

Elegant?  Distributing the source in a different form than *anyone*
else does is elegant?  I thought we all learned what a bad idea that
was from SRPMs...