On Nov 26,  5:09am, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Subject: Re: CVS commit: basesrc
> In article <199911252123.IAA28217@wombat.cs.rmit.edu.au>,
> Luke Mewburn <lukem@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> wrote:
> >Lex Wennmacher writes:
>
> >Will we see the `unvis' equivalent of these?
>
> You don't need it. [the current decoding works fine]

Well, actually there's one situation where you may want to have unsvis
functions. If you put e. g. 'n', 't', or, worse, '0' on the list of extra
characters, think of what unvis does ...