I'm not sure.  The code was unrelated to the X11 code, except that it
could be used by a setuid-root process to access memory (from what I
understand), so I stuck it under 'sysutils'.  Feel free to move it if
you think it's more appropriately classified under 'x11'.

     -- Johnny C. Lam <lamj@stat.cmu.edu>
        Department of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University
        http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~lamj/

Simon Burge <simonb@netbsd.org> writes:
> > XFree86 Framebuffer "aperture" driver for NetBSD
> 
> Wouldn't this make more sense on the x11 category (where things like
> XF86Setup already exist)?  I know that the package has x11 in the
> CATEGORIES list, but if I were looking quickly for this I'd check the
> x11 directory first...
> 
> Simon.