On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 12:10:29PM +0200, Anders Magnusson wrote:
> Eh, what happens when libc routines calls malloc() et al? They will then
> use the libc malloc that may conflict with the mkfs own usage of memory,
> I assume. (I haven't looked at the code).

good point. it *seems* to work (as newfs disk, newfs image, and mfs), but
i'm not 100% convinced yet, so i'm playing it safe like you suggest and
reverting the change for now.

luke.