Subject: Re: CVS commit: basesrc/distrib/sets/lists/base
To: Greg A. Woods <woods@weird.com>
From: Jim Wise <jwise@draga.com>
List: source-changes
Date: 10/12/2001 15:12:30
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Greg A. Woods wrote:
>[ On Friday, October 12, 2001 at 10:27:34 (+0300), Luke Mewburn wrote: ]
>> Subject: CVS commit: basesrc/distrib/sets/lists/base
>>
>>
>> s,/var/named,/var/chroot/named,
>
>This seems like a rather disruptive and unnecessary change for those of
>us who will not likely ever run named chrooted.....
Why? Does anything in netbsd use /var/named by default in the
non-chroot case (the default named.conf uses /etc/namedb).
If not, surely it's not unusual to expect that if you choose a
non-default path, you create that path, no?
- --
Jim Wise
jwise@draga.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (NetBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7x0D1N71lEcOYcw4RAr0tAKCydf/rwgBriw/SFhBox689VlyFLgCaAo/6
rrI3wO2XRc5b6R+fx2Tf1kc=
=PbmQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----