On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:

> In article <Pine.NEB.4.44.0208231854430.11904-100000@oor-wullie.mctavish.co.uk>
> scw@netbsd.org wrote:
>
> > Ok, how about locore_subr.S and trap_subr_4xx.S?
>
> It seems OK, but I have some questions:
>
> 1) Why do we have both ibm4xx/4xx_trap_subr.S and ibm4xx/trap_subr.S ?

You'd have to ask the authors why (Eduardo and Simon).

> 2) Is it possible that a single kernel supports both ibm4xx and mpc6xx?

Not likely.

Cheers, Steve