In article <20030124160704.GA9348@yeah-baby.shagadelic.org>,
   Jason R Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com> wrote:
   >On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 06:30:02PM +1100, matthew green wrote:
   >
   > > will this let, eg, the sysvipc calls (shm?) in uvm become hooks
   > > instead?  that means sysvipc can become an LKM far more easily!
   >
   >Possibly, yes.
   
   Not that easy... Because the exechook() is called too late [after
   the uvm space is switched to the one of the new image and we need
   to destroy the shm space before that is gone].
   
   Also there is the issue of when to destroy the shm space... I don't
   think that the rest of the kernel has enough knowledge to do this.


ok.  i still want to turn sysvipc into LKM's.
i'll start looking at the issues.


.mrg.