Re: pending/21240: Re: Subject: pr/5039 CVS commit: src/usr.bin/vacation

[christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

On Apr 19, 11:34pm, jhawk%MIT.EDU@localhost (John Hawkinson) wrote:
-- Subject: pending/21240: Re: Subject: pr/5039 CVS commit: src/usr.bin/vacat

Read the PR. It explains why. The feature is there and its function is
explained in the man page. The man page is not the proper place for
quoting RFC's.

christos

|  I cannot see a reason why it would ever be acceptable for it to look
|  at the Delivered-To: field. Can you please explain?
|  
|  It seems like a guaranteed shot in the foot with no benefit
|  whatsoever.
|  
|  
|  As for the Apparently-To: field, I can't conceive of a good reason
|  to add the feature, though the shot-in-foot potential is much less. Can
|  you justify adding it, please?
|  
|  --jhawk
| >How-To-Repeat:
| >Fix:
| >Release-Note:
| >Audit-Trail:
| >Unformatted:
-- End of excerpt from John Hawkinson