On Friday, August 22, 2003, at 02:07  PM, Jonathan Stone wrote:

> And I replied that such a change would need a consensus with Sam
> Leffer. To do what you want we would also have to change fast-ipsec to
> accept a struct socket* rather than the struct inpcb* it is passed
> now.  I also said that we will revisit the inpcb*/inpcb6* issue, after
> hooks to fit into fast-ipsec existed for review, and both approaches
> could be compard.

Well, if you knew itojun objected to the change, why did you commit it? 
  What is the point of asking someone to review your changes if you 
simply pretend that they never gave you any feedback?

         -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>