On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:

> In message: <20030921192600.L1261@snowdrop.l8s.co.uk>
>             David Laight <david@l8s.co.uk> writes:
> : > use {u_,}int32_t instead of {u,}int32(={u_,}long)
> :
> : Why?  IIRC uint32_t (and friends) are the 'standard' names and should
> : be defined by intypes.h.
>
> FYI: FreeBSD is moving away from the traditional BSD types (u_intXX_t)
> to the C99 standardized types (uintXX_t).

I think that's the NetBSD direction too, but it's rather gentle at the
moment.

For everyone watching, note the original change was away from {,u}int32 -
no _t on the end. Sounds like a good change. :-)

Take care,

Bill