In article <871xqvujkx.fsf@snark.piermont.com>
perry@piermont.com wrote:

> grant beattie <grant@NetBSD.org> writes:
> > On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 01:10:01PM -0500, Perry E.Metzger wrote:
> >
> >> Sooner, I would say. The goal is to eliminate XF3 soon.
> >
> > and where does this leave platforms/hardware that aren't supported
> > in xf4?
> 
> It isn't good for them, which is why the dreamcast support should be
> added to XF4 and not XF3.

If everyone claims XF3 server should not be added anymore,
I'll just backout all the changes. Unfortunately, no one
is working on XF4 support for dreamcast (or hpcmips), though.

Of course I know sooner is better, and XF4 is better than XF3,
but I'm afraid it couldn't happen _soon_.
(Best or nothing? Or better than nothing? I have no idea.)
---
Izumi Tsutsui
tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp