On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 08:19:26PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> In article <20198.1080375229@splode.eterna.com.au>
> mrg@eterna.com.au wrote:
> 
> > x_gzip is basically an old version of usr.bin/gzip.  ideally the latter
> > can be updated to remove more features with -DSMALL and x_gzip has no
> > sources in it... things i can see off hand:
> 
> I tried a quick patch which disables bzip2 and compress support by
> -DNO_BZIP2_SUPPORT and -DNO_COMPRESS_SUPPORT:
> ---
> % ls -lS gzip*
> -rwxr-xr-x  1 100  100  218791 Mar 27 19:55 gzip-static
> -rwxr-xr-x  1 100  100  214652 Mar 27 19:55 gzip-static_without_compress
> -rwxr-xr-x  1 100  100  168745 Mar 27 19:55 gzip-static_without_bzip2
> -rwxr-xr-x  1 100  100  164478 Mar 27 19:56 gzip-static_without_bzip2_compress
> ---
> Current distrib/utils/x_gzip is:
> ---
> -rwxr-xr-x  1 100  100  145758 Mar 27 20:08 x_gzip-static
> ---
> Is this difference worth? Now distrib/utils/x_gzip should only have
> Makefile with some CPPFLAGS which disables unneeded features?

Unless it's the same size we need to leave x_gzip. On areas cramped for space
this just barely fits.

James