In message: <20040422052529.GC9268@netbsd.org>
            Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@NetBSD.org> writes:
: However I wonder if we really should do this. If the only reason code is 
: safe is that the programmer only had "safe" examples, then we don't have 
: true understanding, we have security through luck.

You have the same problem either way.  If you promote safe practices,
then your chances of being unlucky is much smaller.

Warner