On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 06:15:34PM +0200, Christian Limpach wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 01:14:00AM +1000, matthew green wrote:
> >    From: "matthew green" <mrg@eterna.com.au>
> >    >    Log Message:
> >    >    ``build.sh -m xen-i386 release'' now builds a release for NetBSD/xen
> >    >    for i386.  The resulting release consists of:
> >    >    - NetBSD/xen for i386 kernel, loader and docuemntation
> >    >    - NetBSD/i386 userland sets
> >    >
> >    > if the userland is the same, is there any particular reason that
> >    > i386 can't just include a "xen" kernel?  eg, the way that sparc
> >    > includes a 32bit "sparc64" kernel.  see sparc/conf/GENERIC_SUN4U.
> >    
> >    I'd actually prefer this since you install NetBSD/i386 first and then switch
> >    to the NetBSD/xen kernel.
> >    There might be 2 problems with this though:
> >    - if arch/i386/conf/GENERIC_XEN doesn't compile, release for i386 will fail
> > 
> > i don't think this is a problem.
> 
> It has the definite advantage that anybody making changes to arch/i386
> which break the xen kernel build will notice sooner.
> 
> >    - nothing will build the NetBSD/xen loader and documentation
> > 
> > that can be changed... in the sparc* case, both platforms build
> > the sparc64 loaders (bootblk, which is in forth, and ofwboot,
> > which is largely in C.  the 32 bit ofwboot can load 32 bit or
> > 64 bit kernels.)  docs is a SMOD(? :-)
> 
> The loader build could be added to src/etc/etc.i386/Makefile.inc's
> snap_md_post target and src/sys/arch/Makefile would probably have
> to enter arch/xen when building for i386.  Alternatively the loader
> could be moved under arch/i386/stand since it's i386 specific
> anyway.

That sounds best

> 
> I'm struggling with the docs anyway since the structure of INSTALL.*
> doesn't really fit.

Something which walks through how to setup the hypervisor and get domain0
booted is probably key there.

> 
> >    > this would avoid having to have another port to "release".
> >    
> >    I was thinking that we could maybe add a knob which prevents building the
> >    sets at all for build.sh -m xen-*.
> > 
> > hmmm something along these lines would be ok if we go this route.
> 
> I have a slight preference for "release with i386".

Cutting down build times wouldn't hurt here either.

James