-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Christos Zoulas wrote:

>On Feb 28,  4:44pm, jwise@draga.com (Jim Wise) wrote:
>-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/crypto/dist/ssh
>
>| On Sat, 19 Feb 2005, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>| 
>| >XXX: Should we remove the KRB4 block from the 2.0 dispatch block?
>| 
>| Probably a dumb question, but:  why?
>
>Because it was not there before, and it could be that KRB4 should
>be deprecated for the 2.0 protocol?

I guess that my feeling is that if someone is still using krb4 in this 
day and age, he is probably doing so for a reason (AFS interoperability 
comes immediately to mind).

Given this, I don't think we should place unnecessary burdens (such as 
``you may not use ssh2'') in such users' paths, as long as in avoiding 
such burdens we don't harm users who aren't using krb4.

Thoughts?

- -- 
				Jim Wise
				jwise@draga.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCI5szpRpI6SYACmIRAvCbAJ9O4kQioAjlgPG55Ij5FEw2qdHQCgCfYPdf
6lCHeAwBsW1K/nDrwVO9YXo=
=l/9b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----