--=-=-=


Jim Wise <jwise@draga.com> writes:

>>| Probably a dumb question, but:  why?
>>
>>Because it was not there before, and it could be that KRB4 should
>>be deprecated for the 2.0 protocol?
>
> I guess that my feeling is that if someone is still using krb4 in this 
> day and age, he is probably doing so for a reason (AFS interoperability 
> comes immediately to mind).

All users of AFS should have switched to using 524 and 2b
yestoday. Kerberos V4 is a dead, make its death be honorable.

Love


--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (NetBSD)
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=mQFp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--