> On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 07:00:00PM -0700, Erik E. Fair wrote:
> > IMHO, I'd say that when MD variable names conflict with MI variable=
 =

> > names, MI gets priority.
>
> Yes, I agree. The sparc64 MD variable should be changed (or the confl=
ict
> resolved in another way).

Well...  What we're talking about here is a local variable in an
MI function which counts the number of CPUs in a system and
returns that number.  Is there a good reason it cannot or should
not be renamed from "ncpus" to e.g. "cpus"?  It's not as if this
is a global variable which is part of any MI kernel interface.

Regards,

- H=E5vard